Ithenticate Cost Free Of Plagiarized
Step-by-step instructions are available during the submission process. 5,000-character limit for comments Costs can vary based on student.After carefully reviewing the guidelines below, authors are invited to submit manuscripts online at Polar Research's website. This tool is for personal use only and all documents submitted to the application should be authored or co-authored by the.However, its Turnitins plagiarism checker, iThenticate, that compares most closely. IThenticate Plagiarism Checker The iThenticate plagiarism checker is available to Iowa State faculty and graduate students as a tool to assure theses, journal articles, grants, and other scholarly writings are free of plagiarized text.
I have tried several plagiarism detection tools, iThenticate is by. Easy to use reports make it easy to narrow in on the most critical matches and protect your reputation. 1,300 Top Journals worldwide use iThenticate to screen and review submissions.
IThenticate is a plagiarism screening service that verifies the originality of content submitted before publication. 7500 words or 44500 characters (including spaces), eight figures and no tables.The Norwegian Polar Institute is a member of CrossCheck by CrossRef and iThenticate. 6700 words or 43500 characters (including spaces), six figures and two tables.Sample 2: Ca. 3500 words or 22500 characters (including spaces), two figures and one table.Words and characters for an article of 12 typeset pagesSample 1: Ca.
Review articles, brief research notes, letters to the editor, perspective pieces and book reviews are also included.Perspective pieces are sometimes reviewed, depending on the topic. The submitting author is responsible for securing the initial approval of the submission by the co-authors and for ensuring that co-authors are informed of the manuscript’s progress following submission.The journal is published electronically. If there is a need for printed editions of a special issue, this should be discussed with the editor well in advance.Manuscripts that do not conform to the guidelines given here may be returned to authors before being reviewed.Original primary research papers comprise the mainstay of Polar Research. Any special circumstances should be explained in the cover letter submitted with the online submission.Authors are responsible for disclosing financial support from industry or other support that might bias the interpretation of the results.The submitting author, also known as the contact author, will be the principal contact for editorial correspondence throughout the peer review and proofreading process, if applicable. Submission of a manuscript implies that the work has not been published before, it is not being considered for publication elsewhere and its submission has been approved by all co-authors.
Ithenticate Cost Professional Or Personal
Each author should be able to take public responsibility for a portion of the paper’s content, and should be able to identify the co-authors who are responsible for the remaining material.Contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in the Acknowledgements section. They should not have co-authored articles with any of the authors or have any other close professional or personal association with them.Each of the manuscript’s authors should meet all three of the following criteria: (1) has made a substantial contribution to the design of the study, the collection of the data, or the analysis or interpretation of the data (2) has drafted the manuscript or helped revise it, shaping its intellectual content (3) has approved of the submitted manuscript. Suggested reviewers should not share an institutional affiliation with any of the authors. The facts presented must be sound and the discussion and conclusions that follow from them must be well-grounded.Letters to the editor (which comment on an article in Polar Research) and book reviews are evaluated internally and are not generally sent out for external review.If a submission is intended for a special issue, this should be mentioned in the cover letter.Authors may suggest reviewers in their cover letters.
Addresses for the remaining authors should include department (if relevant), institution (if relevant), city and country. Review papers are also not required to follow the conventional research article format but should be structured in a way suited to the material being presented.AUTHOR NAMES AND ADDRESSES. A complete postal address must be provided for the contact author. Research notes (for example, a report of an observation of unusual animal behaviour) may benefit from a condensed, streamlined format rather than the conventional introduction-methods-results-discussion-conclusion structure. Financial and material support should be acknowledged in a section called Funding, which follows the Acknowledgements.With some exceptions, full-length research papers should be organized as described below.
Omit acronyms in addresses. If there is a strong reason to use the non-English name—for example, a funding agency or employer requires it—the editor should be informed. It is optional to include Orcid ID numbers.Names of universities and other institutions, departments, laboratories and so on should be given in English. The aim is not to impress readers with prestigious affiliations but rather to provide information so that readers can contact authors.
Whereas complete articles are often read by specialists only, abstracts are read by a wide readership who should be able to grasp the motivation for the work, its main findings and why these are important.The abstract should not exceed 250 words. Avoid vague conclusions.An abstract should stand on its own and be understandable independently of the main paper. A common error is to include too much background material in the abstract and not enough specific results. The abstract explains the topic of the paper, the problem or question that the paper seeks to address, what methods were used in the study, what the most important results were and what they mean.
However, in the abstract, which is often read as a stand-alone piece, abbreviations should be spelled out.When a phrase or term only appears a few times in the paper, its abbreviation is usually not warranted. This replaces the spelling out of abbreviations in the main body of the paper and in the table/figure captions. This list will appear on the title page, to the right of the abstract.
This section relates the findings to the motivation stated in the Introduction and takes the outcome of the work to a higher level of abstraction than the Discussion. Depending on the nature of the work, the Results and Discussion may be effectively combined into one section because readers may not be able to make sense of the results without the interpretation. Usually, however, Results and Discussion are separated.CONCLUSION.
0 kommentar(er)
